Is IPM really working?
No, not yet.
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is not a new approach to an old problem. IPM has been practiced since agriculture began. Observation of what was occurring in the crop and the environment, and the farmer trying to modify the environment to support a reduction in whatever risk is present. Quite sophisticated really, observation and modification, development of knowledge, and more observation.
IPM appears to have taken on a simpler view in recent years, being dominated by insect pests as the primary theme of IPM and its implementation. I don’t agree with this simplification and I argue for a broader platform to be presented, taking into account the complete system, of crop and specific varieties, local environment, soils, plants, weather and climate, growth stage, landscape and cultural practices to include only a few aspects. IPM cannot be well served by reductionist science or economic rationalists. Real IPM will only flourish when a more complex systems approach is developed and growers are skilled to actively participate in contributing to knowledge delivered into the system. I call this Real IPM.
Yes, the science needs to continue, and there is a wonderful array of sophisticated and relevant research occurring internationally. But only a few thinkers are connecting all the pieces of the puzzle together.
I will note the writing of Fritjof Capra, The Web Of Life. Not an agricultural treatise by any measure, but a whole of biology message well suited to farmers wanting to change their thinking on farm management. Real IPM isn’t about a balance of chemical and cultural practices, its about the living system, and the very small changes that can be utilised to modify an environment to exclude a pest. Real IPM is landscape scale, not an insect on a leaf scale.
We have presented the Nutrient Series as part of the IPM MasterClass, and guests have asked what nutrition has got to do with IPM. Is the answer . . . lots . . . adequate? If a plant is deficient in a nutrient it is already losing productivity as it cannot function to its biological potential. It is more vulnerable to insect, disease and weather stresses. I include nutrition in Real IPM as an inexpensive, easily managed component of the farming and crop system. Aspects mentioned above are similar.
Whilst working internationally, I had significant problems with a number of species of white grub producing beetles. Observation and other knowledge tools helped me find it was a common flowering hibiscus that was providing habitat for these pests. By replacing the hibiscus with indigenous plants, reduction of beetles was immediate, to levels below economic damage thresholds. Similar research is occurring at the landscape level here in Australia. It is occurring in soil health also. Let’s work to seeing these aspects added into the mix for Real IPM.
Darren Cribbes